Why binary interaction does not necessarily dominate the formation of Wolf-Rayet stars at low metallicity

Abstract

Classical Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars are massive, hydrogen depleted, post main-sequence stars that exhibit emission-line dominated spectra. For a given metallicity Z, stars exceeding a certain initial mass Msingle(Z) can reach the WR phase through intrinsic mass-loss (single-star channel). Stars of lower masses can reach the WR phase via binary mass transfer (binary channel). It is commonly assumed that the binary channel dominates the formation of WR stars in environments with low Z such as the SMC and LMC. However, their reported WR binary fractions of 30-40% are comparable to that of the Galaxy. Here, we explain this apparent contradiction by considering the minimum initial mass Mspec(Z) needed for the stripped product to appear as a WR star. We calibrate Mspec(Z) using the lowest-luminosity WR stars in the Clouds and the Galaxy. A range of Msingle(Z) values are explored using various evolution codes. We estimate the additional contribution of the binary channel by considering the interval [Mspec(Z), Msingle(Z)], which characterises the initial-mass range in which binaries can form additional WR stars. Results: The WR-phenomenon ceases below luminosities of logL = 4.9, 5.25, and 5.6 [Lsun] in the Galaxy, LMC, and SMC, which translates to He-star masses of 7.5, 11, 17 Msun and initial masses of Mspec = 18, 23, 37 Msun. Stripped stars with lower initial masses in the respective galaxies would tend to not appear as WR stars. Msingle lies in the range 20-30, 30-60, and > 40 Msun for the Galaxy, LMC, and SMC. We find that that the additional contribution of the binary channel is a non-trivial function of Z that cannot be conclusively claimed to be monotonically increasing with decreasing Z. Hence, one should not a-priori expect that binary interactions become increasingly important in forming WR stars at low Z, or that the WR binary fraction grows with decreasing Z.

0

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…