Comparison of types for inner forms of GLN

Abstract

Let F be a non-archimedean local field, A be a central simple F-algebra, and G be the multiplicative group of A. To construct types for supercuspidal representations of G, simple types by S\'echerre--Stevens and Yu's construction are already known. In this paper, we compare these constructions. In particular, we show essentially tame supercuspidal representations of G defined by Bushnell--Henniart are nothing but tame supercuspidal representations defined by Yu.

0

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…