Orbital Stability of Exomoons and Submoons with Applications to Kepler 1625b-I
Abstract
An intriguing question in the context of dynamics arises: Could a moon possess a moon itself? Such a configuration does not exist in the Solar System, although this may be possible in theory. Kollmeier et al. (2019) determined the critical size of a satellite necessary to host a long-lived sub-satellite, or submoon. However, the orbital constraints for these submoons to exist are still undetermined. Domingos et al. (2006) indicated that moons are stable out to a fraction of the host planet Hill radius RH,p, which in turn depends on the eccentricity of its host's orbit. Motivated by this, we simulate a system of exomoons and submoons for 105 planetary orbits, while considering many initial orbital phases to obtain the critical semimajor axis in terms of RH,p or the hosts satellite's Hill radius RH,sat, respectively. We find that, assuming circular coplanar orbits, the stability limit for exomoons is 0.40 RH,p and for a submoon is 0.33 RH,sat. Additionally, we discuss the observational feasibility of detecting these sub-satellites through photometric, radial velocity, or direct imaging observations using the Neptunes-sized exomoon candidates Kepler 1625b-I (Teachey et al. 2018) and identify how stability can shape the identification of future candidates.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.