Did have Fermat the solution? An elementary proof of his Last Theorem Abstract We present an elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. No ancillary results are used, not even the most basic ones. The proof directly leads to a contradiction of the Fermat equation in the set of integers.
arXiv:2006.01599 Published May 28, 2020
Authors MC Miguel Antonio Marano Calzolari Comment: 10 pages, in Spanish. The paper contains some wrong identities. This
invalidates its conclusion. More precisely, in page 3, after equation (6), it
is affirmed that bk-3=j_{1d} and ak-2=x. What it actually holds is that bk-3
is a multiple of j_[1d} and ak-2 a multiple of x. This kind of incorrect
arguments is repeated afterwards, in page 7 and at the beginning of page 8,
and finally in page 10, after equation (20). In this way the statement is not
correctly proved, and I apologise for this situation. So I request the
article be removed from the arXiv, or if this is not possible, at least that
the present comment of the author be displayed to the potential readers.
Finally I say that I have tried to, but unfortunately I cannot fix the
errors. Thank you
Updated: July 21, 2020
