Kings and Kernels in Semicomplete Compositions
Abstract
Let k be an integer with k≥ 2. A k-king in a digraph D is a vertex which can reach every other vertex by a directed path of length at most k and a non-king is a vertex which is not a 3-king. A subset K is k-independent if for every pair of vertices x,y ∈ K, we have dD(x, y), dD(y, x)≥ k; it is -absorbent if for every x∈ V(D) K there exists y∈ K such that dD(x, y)≤ . A k-kernel of D is a k-independent and (k-1)-absorbent subset of V(D). A kernel is a 2-kernel. A set K⊂eq V(D) is a quasi-kernel of D if it is independent, and for every vertex x∈ V(D) K, there exists y∈ K such that dD(x, y)≤ 2. The problem k-Kernel is determining whether a given digraph has a k-kernel. Let Q=T[H1, …, Ht] be the composition of T and Hi (1≤ i≤ t, t 2), where T is a digraph with t vertices, and H1, …, Ht are pairwise disjoint digraphs. The composition Q=T[H1, …, Ht] is a semicomplete composition if T is semicomplete. In this paper, we study kings and kernels in semicomplete compositions. For the topic of kings, we characterize digraph compositions with a k-king and digraph compositions all of whose vertices are k-kings, respectively. We also discuss the existence of 3-kings, and study the minimum number of 4-kings in a strong semicomplete composition. For the topic of kernels, we first study the existence of a pair of disjoint quasi-kernels in semicomplete compositions. We then deduce that the problem k-Kernel restricted to strong semicomplete compositions is NP-complete when k∈ \2,3\, and is polynomial-time solvable when k≥ 4. We also prove that when k is divisible by 2 or 3, the problem k-Kernel restricted to non-strong semicomplete compositions is NP-complete.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.