Comparing the inversion statistic for distribution-biased and distribution-shifted permutations with the geometric and the GEM distributions
Abstract
For a distribution p:=\pk\k=1∞ on the positive integers, there are two natural ways to construct a random permutation in Sn or of N from IID samples from p--the p-biased construction and the p-shifted construction. First we consider the case that p is the geometric distribution with parameter 1-q∈(0,1). In this case, the p-shifted random permutation has the Mallows distribution with parameter q. Let Pnb;Geo(1-q) and Pns;Geo(1-q)denote the biased and the shifted distributions on Sn. The expected number of inversions of a permutation under Pns;Geo(1-q) is greater than under Pnb;Geo(1-q), and under either of these, a permutation tends to have many fewer inversions than it would have under the uniform distribution. For fixed n, both Pnb;Geo(1-q) and Pns;Geo(1-q) converge weakly as q1 to the uniform distribution on Sn. We compare the biased and the shifted distributions by studying the inversion statistic under Pnb;Geo(qn) and Pns;Geo(qn) for various rates of convergence of qn to 1. Then we consider p-biased and p-shifted permutations in the case that the distribution p is itself random and distributed as a GEM(θ)-distribution. In both the GEM(θ)-biased and the GEM(θ)-shifted cases, the expected number of inversions behaves asymptotically as it does under the Geo(1-q)-shifted distribution with θ= q1-q. Thus, one can consider the GEM(θ)-shifted case as the random counterpart of the Geo(q)-shifted case. We also consider another p-biased distribution with random p for which the expected number of inversions behaves asymptotically as it does under the Geo(1-q)-biased case with θ and q as above, and with θ∞ and q1.