Supermassive black holes in cosmological simulations I: MBH-Mstar relation and black hole mass function

Abstract

The past decade has seen significant progress in understanding galaxy formation and evolution using large-scale cosmological simulations. While these simulations produce galaxies in overall good agreement with observations, they employ different sub-grid models for galaxies and supermassive black holes (BHs). We investigate the impact of the sub-grid models on the BH mass properties of the Illustris, TNG100, TNG300, Horizon-AGN, EAGLE, and SIMBA simulations, focusing on the MBH-Mstar relation and the BH mass function. All simulations predict tight MBH-Mstar relations, and struggle to produce the lowest (MBH< 107.5 Msun) in galaxies of Mstar~1010.5-1011.5 Msun. While the time evolution of the mean MBH-Mstar relation is mild (<1 dex in BH mass for 0<z<5) for all the simulations, its linearity (shape) and normalization varies from simulation to simulation. The strength of SN feedback has a large impact on the linearity and time evolution for Mstar<1010.5 Msun. We find that the low-mass end is a good discriminant of the simulation models, and highlights the need for new observational constraints. At the high-mass end, strong AGN feedback can suppress the time evolution of the relation normalization. Compared with the observations of the local universe, we find an excess of BHs with MBH>109 Msun in most of the simulations. The BH mass function is dominated by efficiently accreting BHs (log10 fEdd >-2$) at high redshifts, and transitions progressively from the high-mass to the low-mass end to be governed by inactive BHs. The transition time and the contribution of active BHs are different among the simulations, and can be used to evaluate models against observations.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…