Characterizations of stabilizable sets for some parabolic equations in Rn

Abstract

We consider the parabolic type equation in Rn: alignequ-0 (∂t+H)y(t,x)=0,\,\,\, (t,x)∈ (0,∞)×Rn;\;\; y(0,x)∈ L2(Rn), align where H can be one of the following operators: (i) a shifted fractional Laplacian; (ii) a shifted Hermite operator; (iii) the Schr\"odinger operator with some general potentials. We call a subset E⊂ Rn as a stabilizable set for the above equation, if there is a linear bounded operator K on L2(Rn) so that the semigroup \e-t(H-EK)\t≥ 0 is exponentially stable. (Here, E denotes the characteristic function of E, which is treated as a linear operator on L2(Rn).) This paper presents different geometric characterizations of the stabilizable sets for the above equation with different H. In particular, when H is a shifted fractional Laplacian, E⊂ Rn is a stabilizable set if and only if E⊂ Rn is a thick set, while when H is a shifted Hermite operator, E⊂ Rn is a stabilizable set for if and only if E⊂ Rn is a set of positive measure. Our results, together with the results on the observable sets for the above equation obtained in AB,Ko,Li,M09, reveal such phenomena: for some H, the class of stabilizable sets contains strictly the class of observable sets, while for some other H, the classes of stabilizable sets and observable sets coincide. Besides, this paper gives some sufficient conditions on the stabilizable sets for the above equation where H is the Schr\"odinger operator with some general potentials.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…