Comparisons of Different Fitting Methods for the Physical Parameters of A Star Cluster Sample of M33 with Spectroscopy and Photometry
Abstract
Star clusters are good tracers for formation and evolution of galaxies. We compared different fitting methods by using spectra (or by combining photometry) to determine the physical parameters. We choose a sample of 17 star clusters in M33, which previously lacked spectroscopic observations. The low-resolution spectra were taken with the Xinglong 2.16-m reflector of NAOC. The photometry used in the fitting includes uSC and vSAGE bands from the SAGE survey, as well as the published UBVRI and ugriz photometry. We firstly derived ages and metallicities with the ULySS (Vazdekis et al. and pegase-hr) SSP model and the Bruzual \& Charlot (2003) (BC03) stellar population synthesis models for the full-spectrum fitting. The fitting results of both the BC03 and ULySS models seem consistent with those of previous works as well. Then we add the SAGE uSC and vSAGE photometry in the spectroscopic fitting with the BC03 models. It seems the results become much better, especially for the Padova 2000+Chabrier IMF set. Finally we add more photometry data, UBVRI and ugriz, in the fitting and we found that the results do not improve significantly. Therefore, we conclude that the photometry is useful for improving the fitting results, especially for the blue bands (λ <4000 ), e.g., uSC and vSAGE band. At last, we discuss the "UV-excess" for the star clusters and we find five star clusters have UV-excess, based on the GALEX FUV, NUV photometry.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.