Conch Maximal Subrings
Abstract
It is shown that if R is a ring, p a prime element of an integral domain D≤ R with n=1∞ pnD=0 and p∈ U(R), then R has a conch maximal subring (see faith). We prove that either a ring R has a conch maximal subring or U(S)=S U(R) for each subring S of R (i.e., each subring of R is closed with respect to taking inverse, see invsub). In particular, either R has a conch maximal subring or U(R) is integral over the prime subring of R. We observe that if R is an integral domain with |R|=220, then either R has a maximal subring or |Max(R)|=20, and in particular if in addition dim(R)=1, then R has a maximal subring. If R⊂eq T be an integral ring extension, Q∈ Spec(T), P:=Q R, then we prove that whenever R has a conch maximal subring S with (S:R)=P, then T has a conch maximal subring V such that (V:T)=Q and V R=S. It is shown that if K is an algebraically closed field which is not algebraic over its prime subring and R is affine ring over K, then for each prime ideal P of R with ht(P)≥ dim(R)-1, there exists a maximal subring S of R with (S:R)=P. If R is a normal affine integral domain over a field K, then we prove that R is an integrally closed maximal subring of a ring T if and only if dim(R)=1 and in particular in this case (R:T)=0.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.