Refuting a Proposed Axiom for Defining the Exact Rotating Wave Approximation
Abstract
For a linearly driven quantum two-level system, or qubit, sets of stroboscropic points along the cycloidal-like trajectory in the rotating frame can be approximated using the exact rotating wave approximation introduced in arXiv:1807.02858. That work introduces an effective Hamiltonian series Heff generating smoothed qubit trajectories; this series has been obtained using a combination of a Magnus expansion and a Taylor series, a Magnus-Taylor expansion. Since, however, this Hamiltonian series is not guaranteed to converge for arbitrary pulse shapes, the same work hypothesizes an axiomatic definition of the effective Hamiltonian. The first two of the proposed axioms define Heff to (i) be analytic and (ii) generate a stroboscopic time evolution. In this work we probe a third axiom---motivated by the smoothed trajectories mentioned above---namely, (iii) a variational principle stating that the integral of the Hamiltonian's positive eigenvalue taken over the full pulse duration is minimized by this Heff. We numerically refute the validity of this third axiom via a variational minimization of the said integral.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.