The twinning operation on graphs does not always preserve e-positivity

Abstract

Motivated by Stanley's (3+1)-free conjecture on chromatic symmetric functions, Foley, Ho\`ang and Merkel introduced the concept of strong e-positivity and conjectured that a graph is strongly e-positive if and only if it is (claw, net)-free. In order to study strongly e-positive graphs, they further introduced the twinning operation on a graph G with respect to a vertex v, which adds a vertex v' to G such that v and v' are adjacent and any other vertex is adjacent to both of them or neither of them. Foley, Ho\`ang and Merkel conjectured that if G is e-positive, then so is the resulting twin graph Gv for any vertex v. Based on the theory of chromatic symmetric functions in non-commuting variables developed by Gebhard and Sagan, we establish the e-positivity of a class of graphs called tadpole graphs. By considering the twinning operation on a subclass of these graphs with respect to certain vertices we disprove the latter conjecture of Foley, Ho\`ang and Merkel. We further show that if G is e-positive, the twin graph Gv and more generally the clan graphs G(k)v (k 1) may not even be s-positive, where G(k)v is obtained from G by applying k twinning operations to v.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…