On distributivity in higher algebra I: The universal property of bispans

Abstract

Structures where we have both a contravariant (pullback) and a covariant (pushforward) functoriality that satisfy base change can be encoded by functors out of (∞-)categories of spans (or correspondences). In this paper we study the more complicated setup where we have two pushforwards (an "additive" and a "multiplicative" one), satisfying a distributivity relation. Such structures can be described in terms of bispans (or polynomial diagrams). We show that there exist (∞,2)-categories of bispans, characterized by a universal property: they corepresent functors out of ∞-categories of spans where the pullbacks have left adjoints and certain canonical 2-morphisms (encoding base change and distributivity) are invertible. This gives a universal way to obtain functors from bispans, which amounts to upgrading "monoid-like" structures to "ring-like" ones. For example, symmetric monoidal ∞-categories can be described as product-preserving functors from spans of finite sets, and if the tensor product is compatible with finite coproducts our universal property gives the canonical semiring structure using the coproduct and tensor product. More interestingly, we encode the additive and multiplicative transfers on equivariant spectra as a functor from bispans in finite G-sets, extend the norms for finite \'etale maps in motivic spectra to a functor from certain bispans in schemes, and make Perf(X) for X a spectral Deligne--Mumford stack a functor of bispans using a multiplicative pushforward for finite \'etale maps in addition to the usual pullback and pushforward maps. Combining this with the polynomial functoriality of K-theory constructed by Barwick, Glasman, Mathew, and Nikolaus, we obtain norms on algebraic K-theory spectra.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…