Optimal bounds for the colorful fractional Helly theorem

Abstract

The well known fractional Helly theorem and colorful Helly theorem can be merged into the so called colorful fractional Helly theorem. It states: For every α ∈ (0, 1] and every non-negative integer d, there is βcol = βcol(α, d) ∈ (0, 1] with the following property. Let F1, …, Fd+1 be finite nonempty families of convex sets in Rd of sizes n1, …, nd+1 respectively. If at least α n1 n2 ·s nd+1 of the colorful (d+1)-tuples have a nonempty intersection, then there is i ∈ [d+1] such that Fi contains a subfamily of size at least βcol ni with a nonempty intersection. (A colorful (d+1)-tuple is a (d+1)-tuple (F1, … , Fd+1) such that Fi belongs to Fi for every i.) The colorful fractional Helly theorem was first stated and proved by B\'ar\'any, Fodor, Montejano, Oliveros, and P\'or in 2014 with βcol = α/(d+1). In 2017 Kim proved the theorem with better function βcol, which in particular tends to 1 when α tends to 1. Kim also conjectured what is the optimal bound for βcol(α, d) and provided the upper bound example for the optimal bound. The conjectured bound coincides with the optimal bounds for the (non-colorful) fractional Helly theorem proved independently by Eckhoff and Kalai around 1984. We verify Kim's conjecture by extending Kalai's approach to the colorful scenario. Moreover, we obtain optimal bounds also in more general setting when we allow several sets of the same color.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…