Line formation of He I D3 and He I 10830 in a small-scale reconnection event

Abstract

Aims. We aim to explain line formation of He I D3 and He I 10830 in small-scale reconnection events. Methods. We make use of a simulated Ellerman bomb (EB), present in a Bifrost-generated radiative Magnetohydrodynamics (rMHD) snapshot. The resulting He I D3 and He I 10830 \ line intensities are synthesized in 3D using the non-LTE Multi3D code. We compare the synthetic helium spectra with observed SST/TRIPPEL raster scans of EBs in He I 10830 \ and He I D3. Results. Emission in He I D3 and He I 10830 \ is formed in a thin shell around the EB at a height of 0.8 Mm while the He I D3 absorption is formed above the EB at 4 Mm. The height at which the emission is formed corresponds to the lower boundary of the EB, where the temperature increases rapidly from 6· 103 K to 106 K. The opacity in He I D3 and He I 10830 \ is generated via photoionization-recombination driven by EUV radiation that is locally generated in the EB at temperatures in the range of 2· 104 - 2· 106 K and electron densities between 1011 and 1013 cm-3. The synthetic emission signals are a result of coupling to local conditions in a thin shell around the EB, with temperatures between 7· 103 and 104 K and electron densities ranging from 1012 to 1013 cm-3. Hence, both strong non-LTE as well as thermal processes play a role in the formation of He I D3 and He I 10830 \ in the synthetic EB/UV burst that we studied. Conclusions. In conclusion, the synthetic He I D3 and He I 10830 \ emission signatures are an indicator of temperatures of at least 2· 104 K and in this case as high as 106 K.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…