On Very Generic Discriminantal Arrangements

Abstract

In this article we prove two main results. Firstly, we show that any six-line arrangement, consisting of three pairs of mutually perpendicular lines, does not give rise to a "very generic or sufficiently general" discriminantal arrangement in the sense of C. A. Athanasiadis MR1720104. We give two proofs of the first result. The second result is as follows. The codimension-one boundary faces of (a region) a convex cone of a very generic discriminantal arrangement has not been characterized and is not known even though the intersection lattice of a very generic discriminantal arrangement is known. So secondly, we show that the number of simplex cells of the very generic hyperplane arrangement Hmn=\Hi:j=1mΣaijxj=ci,1≤ i≤ n\ may not be not precisely equal to the number of codimension-one boundary hyperplanes of Rn of the convex cone C containing (c1,c2,…,cn) in the associated very generic discriminantal arrangement. That is, for 1≤ i1<i2<…<im<im+1≤ n, if m Hi1Hi2… HimHim+1 is a simplex cell of the hyperplane arrangement Hmn then it need not give rise to a codimension-one boundary hyperplane of the convex cone C containing (c1,c2,…,cn) in the associated very generic discriminantal arrangement. We finally mention an interesting open-ended remark before the appendix section. In the appendix section we give a self contained exposition and describe combinatorially the intersection lattice of a (Zariski open and dense) class of "very generic or sufficiently general" discriminantal arrangements. As a consequence, we give a geometric description of the lattice elements as sets of concurrencies of the hyperplane arrangements which give the same "very generic or sufficiently general" discriminantal arrangement.

0

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…