Uniqueness theorems of meromorphic functions with their differential-difference operators in several complex variables

Abstract

An example in the article shows that the first derivative of f(z)=21-e-2z sharing 0 CM and 1,∞ IM with its shift π i cannot obtain they are equal. In this paper, we study the uniqueness of meromorphic function sharing small functions with their shifts concerning its k-th derivatives. We improves the author's result h from entire function to meromorphic function, the first derivative to its differential-difference polynomial, and also finite values to small functions. As for k=0, we obtain: Let f(z) be a transcendental meromorphic function of 2(f)<1, let c be a nonzero finite value, and let a1(z)∞, a2(z)∞∈ S(f) be two distinct small functions of f(z) such that a(z) is a periodic function with period c and b(z) is any small function of f(z). If f(z) and f(z+c) share a1(z),∞ CM, and share a2(z) IM, then either f(z) f(z+c) or ep(z) f(z+c)-a1(z+c)f(z)-a1(z) a2(z+c)-a1(z+c)a2(z)-a1(z), where p(z) is a non-constant entire function of (p)<1 such that ep(z+c) ep(z).

0

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…