Independent sets in hypergraphs omitting an intersection
Abstract
A k-uniform hypergraph with n vertices is an (n,k,)-omitting system if it does not contain two edges whose intersection has size exactly . If in addition it does not contain two edges whose intersection has size greater than , then it is an (n,k,)-system. R\"odl and Sinajov\'a proved a lower bound for the independence number of (n,k,)-systems that is sharp in order of magnitude for fixed 2 k-1. We consider the same question for the larger class of (n,k,)-omitting systems. For k 2+1, we believe that the behavior is similar to the case of (n,k,)-systems and prove a nontrivial lower bound for the first open case =k-2. For k>2+1 we give new lower and upper bounds which show that the minimum independence number of (n,k,)-omitting systems has a very different behavior than for (n,k,)-systems. Our lower bound for =k-2 uses some adaptations of the random greedy independent set algorithm, and our upper bounds (constructions) for k> 2+1 are obtained from some pseudorandom graphs. We also prove some related results where we forbid more than two edges with a prescribed common intersection size and this leads to some applications in Ramsey theory. For example, we obtain good bounds for the Ramsey number rk(Fk,t), where Fk is the k-uniform Fan. Here the behavior is quite different than the case k=2 which reduces to the classical graph Ramsey number r(3,t).
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.