Equifocal submanifolds with non-flat section and topological Tits buildings
Abstract
From the Lytchak's result for polar foliations on an irreducible simply connected symmetric space G/K of compact type and rank greater than one, we can derive that there exists no equifocal submanifold with non-flat section whose codimension is greater than two in the symmetric space G/K. In the first-half part of this paper, we give a new proof of this non-existence theorem. The recipi of our new proof is as follows. Suppose that there exists an equifocal submanifold M with non-flat section whose codimension is greater than two in an irreducible symmertric space G/K of compact type and rank greater than one. We introduce the notion of a slice topology of G/K associated to M. We consider the universal covering π:G/K G/K of the slice topological space G/K and give G/K the manifold structure and the Riemannian metric such that π is a Riemannian submersion onto the symmetric space G/K. First we show that a simplicial decomposition of the Riemannian manifold G/K gives an irreducible topological Tits building of spherical type and rank greater than two. By applying Burns-Spatzier's theorem to this topological Tits building, we show that the Riemannian manifold G/K is homothetic to the unit sphere. Furthermore, from this fact, we show that G/K is isometric to a sphere, a complex projective space or a quaternionic projective space. This contradicts that G/K is of rank greater than one. This is the recipi of our proof. In the second-half part, we estimate the codimension of M from above by using the multiplicities of the roots of the root system of G/K. As its result, we can show that there exists no equifocal submanifold with non-flat section in some irreducible simply connected symmetric spaces of compact type.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.