On non-uniqueness of recovering Sturm-Liouville operators with delay and the Neumann boundary condition at zero

Abstract

As is known, for each fixed ∈\0,1\, the spectra of two operators generated by -y''(x)+q(x)y(x-a) and the boundary conditions y()(0)=y(j)(π)=0, j=0,1, uniquely determine the complex-valued square-integrable potential q(x) vanishing on (0,a) as soon as a∈[2π/5,π). Meanwhile, it actually became the main question of the inverse spectral theory for Sturm-Liouville operators with constant delay whether the uniqueness holds also for smaller values of a. Recently, a negative answer was given by the authors [Appl. Math. Lett. 113 (2021) 106862] for a∈[π/3,2π/5) in the case =0 by constructing an infinite family of iso-bispectral potentials. Moreover, an essential and dramatic reason was established why this strategy, generally speaking, fails in the remarkable case when =1. Here we construct a counterexample giving a negative answer for =1, which is an important subcase of the Robin boundary condition at zero. We also refine the former counterexample for =0 to W21-potentials.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…