Heavy Neutrino Searches via Same-sign Lepton Pairs at the Higgs Factory

Abstract

This paper investigates the e-e+ Zh1 sensitivity for Higgs boson's rare decay into heavy neutrinos h1 NN at the proposed electron-positron collider, with the focus on multi-lepton final states that contain same-sign lepton pairs. h1 NN decay can derive from Higgs boson's mixing with new physics scalar(s) that is complementary to the contribution from active-sterile neutrino mixings. We consider the scenario with a singlet scalar which gives the heavy neutrino mass and has a small mixing with the SM Higgs boson. We analyze the semileptonic, fully leptonic and mixed NN decay scenarios, and categorize the signal on the number of leptons in the final state: with at least 3 jets, with at least 2 jets, and e e μ μ plus with at least 1 jet, each containing one or two same-sign dilepton system(s). Selection cuts are optimized for the presence of the associated Z-boson, which leads to additional backgrounds at the e-e+ collider. The Standard Model background channels are systematically analyzed. Sensitivity limits on h1 → NN branching fractions are derived for signals with 2-4 final leptons assuming the heavy neutrino masses are between 10 and 60 GeV. With 240 GeV center-of-mass energy and 5.6 ab-1 design luminosity, h1 → NN branching fraction can be probed to 2× 10-4 in 2 and 3 channels, and 6× 10-4 in the 4 channel at 95\% confidence level. 3, 4 channels expect one or fewer background event, and their sensitivities saturate the statistic limit at 5.6 ab-1 luminosity. A same-sign trilepton ( ) signal in the 3 channel is also discussed. Our search strategy provides an approach to discovering the singlet scalar and exploring the origin of neutrino masses at future e-e+ colliders.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…