Reverse Holder, Minkowski, And Hanner Inequalities For Matrices

Abstract

We examine a number of known inequalities for Lp functions with reverse representations for s<1 with complex matrices under the p-norms ||X||p=Tr[(X X)p/2]1/p, and similarly defined quasinorm or antinorm quantities ||X||s=Tr[(X X)s/2]1/s. Analogous to the reverse H\"older and reverse Minkowski for Lp functions, it has recently been shown that for A,B∈ Mn× n(C) such that |B| is invertible, ||AB||1≥ ||A||s||B||s/(s-1) and for A,B positive semidefinite that ||A+B||s≥ ||A||s+||B||s. We comment on variational representations of these inequalities. A third very important inequality is Hanner's inequality ||f+g||pp+||f-g||pp≥(||f||p+||g||p)p+|||f||p-||g||p|p in the 1≤ p≤ 2 range, with the inequality reversing for p≥ 2. The analogue inequality has been proven to hold matrices in certain special cases. No reverse Hanner has established for functions or matrices considering ranges with s<1. We develop a reverse Hanner inequality for functions, and show that it holds for matrices under special conditions; it is sufficient but not necessary for C+D, C-D≥ 0. We also extend certain related singular value rearrangement inequalities that were previously known in the 1≤ p≤3 range to the s<1 range. Finally, we use the same techniques to characterize the previously unstudied equality case: we show that there is equality when p≠ 1,2 if and only if |D|=k|C|, which is directly analogous to the Lp equality condition.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…