Correlations between Hα Equivalent Width and Galaxy Properties at z = 0.47: Physical or Selection-driven?

Abstract

The Hα equivalent width (EW) is an observational proxy for specific star formation rate (sSFR) and a tracer of episodic star-formation activity. Previous assessments show that EW strongly anti-correlates with stellar mass as M-0.25 similar to the sSFR -- stellar mass relation. However, such a correlation may be driven/formed by selection effects. In this study, we investigate how Hα EWs correlate with galaxy properties and how selection biases could alter such correlations using a z = 0.47 narrowband-selected sample of 1572 Hα emitters from the Lyα Galaxies in the Epoch of Reionization (LAGER) survey. The sample covers 3 deg2 of COSMOS and 1.1×105 cMpc3. We assume an intrinsic EW distribution to form mock samples of Hα emitters (HAEs) and propagate the selection criteria to match observations, giving us control on how selection biases can affect the underlying results. We find EW intrinsically correlates with stellar mass as W0 M-0.160.03 and decreases by a factor of 3 from 107 to 1010 M. We find low-mass HAEs to be 320 times more likely to have rest-frame EW > 200 compared to high-mass HAEs. Combining the intrinsic EW -- stellar mass correlation with an observed SMF correctly reproduces the observed Hα LF, while not correcting for selection effects underestimates the number of bright HAEs. This suggests that the intrinsic EW -- stellar mass correlation is physically significant and reproduces three statistical distributions of galaxy populations (LF, SMF, EW distribution). At lower masses, we find there are more high-EW outliers compared to high masses, even after taking into account selection effects. Our results suggest that high sSFR outliers indicative of bursty SF activity are intrinsically more prevalent in low-mass HAEs and not a byproduct of selection effects.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…