Ramsey numbers of sparse digraphs

Abstract

Burr and Erdos in 1975 conjectured, and Chv\'atal, R\"odl, Szemer\'edi and Trotter later proved, that the Ramsey number of any bounded degree graph is linear in the number of vertices. In this paper, we disprove the natural directed analogue of the Burr--Erdos conjecture, answering a question of Buci\'c, Letzter, and Sudakov. If H is an acyclic digraph, the oriented Ramsey number of H, denoted r1(H), is the least N such that every tournament on N vertices contains a copy of H. We show that for any ≥ 2 and any sufficiently large n, there exists an acyclic digraph H with n vertices and maximum degree such that \[ r1(H) n(2/3/ 5/3 ). \] This proves that r1(H) is not always linear in the number of vertices for bounded-degree H. On the other hand, we show that r1(H) is nearly linear in the number of vertices for typical bounded-degree acyclic digraphs H, and obtain linear or nearly linear bounds for several natural families of bounded-degree acyclic digraphs. For multiple colors, we prove a quasi-polynomial upper bound rk(H)=2( n)Ok(1) for all bounded-degree acyclic digraphs H on n vertices, where rk(H) is the least N such that every k-edge-colored tournament on N vertices contains a monochromatic copy of H. For k≥ 2 and n≥ 4, we exhibit an acyclic digraph H with n vertices and maximum degree 3 such that rk(H) n( n/ n), showing that these Ramsey numbers can grow faster than any polynomial in the number of vertices.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…