Non-thermal escape of the Martian CO2 atmosphere over time: constrained by Ar isotopes

Abstract

The ion escape of Mars' CO2 atmosphere caused by its dissociation products C and O atoms is simulated from present time to 4.1 billion years ago (Ga) by numerical models of the upper atmosphere and its interaction with the solar wind. The planetward-scattered pick-up ions are used for sputtering estimates of exospheric particles including 36Ar and 38Ar isotopes. Total ion escape, sputtering and photochemical escape rates are compared. For solar EUV fluxes ≥\,3 times that of today's Sun (earlier than 2.6 Ga) ion escape becomes the dominant atmospheric non-thermal loss process until thermal escape takes over during the pre-Noachian eon (earlier than 4.0\,-\,4.1 Ga). If we extrapolate the total escape of CO2-related dissociation products back in time until 4.1 Ga we obtain a maximum theoretical equivalent to CO2 partial pressure of more than 0.4 bar through non-thermal escape during quiet solar wind conditions. However, surface-atmosphere interaction and/or extreme solar events such as frequent CMEs could have increased this value even further. By including the surface as a sink, up to 0.9\,bar, or even up to 1.8\,bar in case of hidden carbonate reservoirs, could have been present at 4.1\,Ga The fractionation of 36Ar/38Ar isotopes through sputtering and volcanic outgassing from its initial chondritic value of 5.3, as measured in the 4.1 billion years old Mars meteorite ALH 84001, until the present day, however, can be reproduced for assumed CO2 partial pressures of 0.01 -- 0.4\,bar without, and 0.4 -- 1.8\,bar including surface sinks, and depending on the cessation time of the Martian dynamo (assumed between 3.6\,--\,4.0 Ga) - if atmospheric sputtering of Ar started afterwards.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…