Moves relating C-complexes: A correction to Cimasoni's "A geometric construction of the Conway potential function"
Abstract
In groundbreaking work from 2004, Cimasoni gave a geometric computation of the multivariable Conway potential function in terms of a generalization of a Seifert surface for a link called a C-complex. Lemma 3 of that paper provides a family of moves which relates any two C-complexes for a fixed link. This allows for an approach to studying links from the point of view of C-complexes and in following papers it has been used to derive invariants. This lemma is false. We present counterexamples, a correction with detailed proof, and an analysis of the consequences of this error on subsequent works that rely on this lemma.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.