Fork-join and redundancy systems with heavy-tailed job sizes

Abstract

We investigate the tail asymptotics of the response time distribution for the cancel-on-start (c.o.s.) and cancel-on-completion (c.o.c.) variants of redundancy-d scheduling and the fork-join model with heavy-tailed job sizes. We present bounds, which only differ in the pre-factor, for the tail probability of the response time in the case of the first-come first-served (FCFS) discipline. For the c.o.s. variant we restrict ourselves to redundancy-d scheduling, which is a special case of the fork-join model. In particular, for regularly varying job sizes with tail index - the tail index of the response time for the c.o.s. variant of redundancy-d equals -\dcap(-1),\, where dcap = \d,N-k\, N is the number of servers and k is the integer part of the load. This result indicates that for dcap < -1 the waiting time component is dominant, whereas for dcap > -1 the job size component is dominant. Thus, having d = \-1,N-k\ replicas is sufficient to achieve the optimal asymptotic tail behavior of the response time. For the c.o.c. variant of the fork-join(nF,nJ) model the tail index of the response time, under some assumptions on the load, equals 1- and 1-(nF+1-nJ), for identical and i.i.d. replicas, respectively; here the waiting time component is always dominant.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…