Extending Properly n-REA Sets

Abstract

In [5] Soare and Stob prove that if A is an r.e. set which isn't computable then there is a set of the form A WAe which isn't of r.e. Turing degree. If we define a properly n+1-REA set to be an n+1-REA set which isn't Turing equivalent to any n-REA set this result shows that every properly 1-REA set can be extended to a properly 2-REA set. This result was extended in [1] by Cholak and Hinman who proved that every 2-REA set can be extended to a properly 3-REA set. This leads naturally to the hypothesis that every properly n-REA set can be extended to a properly n+1-REA set. In this paper, we show this hypothesis is false and that there is a properly 3-REA set which can't be extended to a properly 4-REA set.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…