Non-vanishing higher derived limits

Abstract

In the study of strong homology Mardesi\'c and Prasolov isolated a certain inverse system of abelian groups A indexed by elements of ωω. They showed that if strong homology is additive on a class of spaces containing closed subsets of Euclidean spaces then the higher derived limits n A must vanish, for n>0. They also proved that under the Continuum Hypothesis 1 A ≠ 0. The question whether n A vanishes, for n>0, has attracted considerable interest from set theorists. Dow, Simon and Vaughan showed that under PFA 1 A =0. Bergfalk show that it is consistent that 2 A does not vanish. Later Bergfalk and Lambie-Hanson showed that, modulo a weakly compact cardinal, it is relatively consistent with ZFC that n A =0, for all n. The large cardinal assumption was recently removed by Bergfalk, Hrusak and Lambie-Henson. We complete the picture by showing that, for any n>0, it is relatively consistent with ZFC that n A ≠ 0.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…