Left orderability, foliations, and transverse (π1,R) structures for 3-manifolds with sphere boundary

Abstract

Let M be a closed orientable irreducible 3-manifold such that π1(M) is left orderable. (a) Let M0 = M - Int(B3), where B3 is a compact 3-ball in M. We have a process to produce a co-orientable Reebless foliation F in M0 such that: (1) F has a transverse (π1(M),R) structure, (2) there exists a simple closed curve in M that is co-orientably transverse to F and intersects every leaf of F. More specifically, given a pair (<,) composed of a left-invariant order "<" of π1(M) and a fundamental domain of M in its universal cover with certain property (which always exists), we can produce a resulting foliation in M - Int(B3) as above, and we can test if it can extend to a taut foliation of M. (b) Suppose further that M is either atoroidal or a rational homology 3-sphere. If M admits an R-covered foliation F0, then there is a resulting foliation F of our process in M - Int(B3) such that: F can extend to an R-covered foliation Fextend of M, and F0 can be recovered from doing a collapsing operation on Fextend. Here, by a collapsing operation on Fextend, we mean the following process: (1) choosing an embedded product space S × I in M for some (possibly non-compact) surface S such that S × \0\, S × \1\ are leaves of Fextend (notice that Fextend S × I may not be a product bundle), (2) replacing Fextend S × I by a single leaf S. (c) We conjecture that there always exists a resulting foliation of our process in M - Int(B3) which can extend to a taut foliation in M.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…