Functional lower bounds for restricted arithmetic circuits of depth four

Abstract

Recently, Forbes, Kumar and Saptharishi [CCC, 2016] proved that there exists an explicit dO(1)-variate and degree d polynomial Pd∈ VNP such that if any depth four circuit C of bounded formal degree d which computes a polynomial of bounded individual degree O(1), that is functionally equivalent to Pd, then C must have size 2(dd). The motivation for their work comes from Boolean Circuit Complexity. Based on a characterization for ACC0 circuits by Yao [FOCS, 1985] and Beigel and Tarui [CC, 1994], Forbes, Kumar and Saptharishi [CCC, 2016] observed that functions in ACC0 can also be computed by algebraic circuits (i.e., circuits of the form -- sums of powers of polynomials) of 2^O(1)n size. Thus they argued that a 2ω(O(1)n) "functional" lower bound for an explicit polynomial Q against circuits would imply a lower bound for the "corresponding Boolean function" of Q against non-uniform ACC0. In their work, they ask if their lower bound be extended to circuits. In this paper, for large integers n and d such that ω(2n)≤ d≤ n0.01, we show that any circuit of bounded individual degree at most O(dk2) that functionally computes Iterated Matrix Multiplication polynomial IMMn,d (∈ VP) over \0,1\n2d must have size n(k). Since Iterated Matrix Multiplication IMMn,d over \0,1\n2d is functionally in GapL, improvement of the afore mentioned lower bound to hold for quasipolynomially large values of individual degree would imply a fine-grained separation of ACC0 from GapL.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…