CP asymmetry in the angular distributions of τ KSπτ decays -- II: general effective field theory analysis

Abstract

We proceed to study the CP asymmetry in the angular distributions of τ KSπτ decays within a general effective field theory framework including four-fermion operators up to dimension-six. It is found that, besides the commonly considered scalar-vector interference, the tensor-scalar interference can also produce a non-zero CP asymmetry in the angular distributions. Bounds on the effective couplings of the non-standard scalar and tensor interactions are obtained under the combined constraints from the measured CP asymmetries and the branching ratio of τ- KSπ-τ decay, with Im[εS]=-0.0080.027 and Im[εT]=0.030.12, at the scale μτ=2~GeV in the MS scheme. Using the best-fit values, we also find that the distributions of the CP asymmetries can deviate significantly from the SM expectation in almost the whole Kπ invariant-mass region. Nevertheless, the current bounds are still plagued by large experimental uncertainties, but will be improved with more precise measurements from Belle II as well as the proposed Tera-Z and STCF facilities. Assuming further that the non-standard scalar and tensor interactions originate from a weakly-coupled heavy new physics well above the electroweak scale, the SU(2)L invariance of the resulting SMEFT Lagrangian would indicate that very strong limits on Im[εS] and Im[εT] could also be obtained from the neutron electric dipole moment and the D0-D0 mixing. With the bounds from these processes taken into account, it is then found that, unless there exist extraordinary cancellations between the new physics contributions, neither the scalar nor the tensor interaction can produce any significant effects on the CP asymmetries in the processes considered.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…