Reducing Linear Hadwiger's Conjecture to Coloring Small Graphs

Abstract

In 1943, Hadwiger conjectured that every graph with no Kt minor is (t-1)-colorable for every t 1. In the 1980s, Kostochka and Thomason independently proved that every graph with no Kt minor has average degree O(t t) and hence is O(t t)-colorable. Recently, Norin, Song and the second author showed that every graph with no Kt minor is O(t( t)β)-colorable for every β > 1/4, making the first improvement on the order of magnitude of the O(t t) bound. The first main result of this paper is that every graph with no Kt minor is O(t t)-colorable. This is a corollary of our main technical result that the chromatic number of a Kt-minor-free graph is bounded by O(t(1+f(G,t))) where f(G,t) is the maximum of (H)a over all a t t and Ka-minor-free subgraphs H of G that are small (i.e. O(a4 a) vertices). This has a number of interesting corollaries. First as mentioned, using the current best-known bounds on coloring small Kt-minor-free graphs, we show that Kt-minor-free graphs are O(t t)-colorable. Second, it shows that proving Linear Hadwiger's Conjecture (that Kt-minor-free graphs are O(t)-colorable) reduces to proving it for small graphs. Third, we prove that Kt-minor-free graphs with clique number at most t/ ( t)2 are O(t)-colorable. This implies our final corollary that Linear Hadwiger's Conjecture holds for Kr-free graphs for every fixed r. One key to proving the main theorem is a new standalone result that every Kt-minor-free graph of average degree d=(t) has a subgraph on O(t 3 t) vertices with average degree (d).

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…