Gutzwiller-projected states for the J1-J2 Heisenberg model on the kagome lattice: achievements and pitfalls

Abstract

We assess the ground-state phase diagram of the J1-J2 Heisenberg model on the kagome lattice by employing Gutzwiller-projected fermionic wave functions. Within this framework, different states can be represented, defined by distinct unprojected fermionic Hamiltonians that include hopping and pairing terms, as well as a coupling to local Zeeman fields to generate magnetic order. For J2=0, the so-called U(1) Dirac state, in which only hopping is present (such as to generate a π-flux in the hexagons), has been shown to accurately describe the exact ground state [Y. Iqbal, F. Becca, S. Sorella, and D. Poilblanc, Phys. Rev. B 87, 060405 (2013); Y.-C. He, M. P. Zaletel, M. Oshikawa, and F. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031020 (2017)]. Here, we show that its accuracy improves in presence of a small antiferromagnetic super-exchange J2, leading to a finite region where the gapless spin liquid is stable; then, for J2/J1=0.11(1), a first-order transition to a magnetic phase with pitch vector q=(0,0) is detected, by allowing magnetic order within the fermionic Hamiltonian. Instead, for small ferromagnetic values of |J2|/J1, the situation is more contradictory. While the U(1) Dirac state remains stable against several perturbations in the fermionic part (i.e., dimerization patterns or chiral terms), its accuracy clearly deteriorates on small systems, most notably on 36 sites where exact diagonalization is possible. Then, upon increasing the ratio |J2|/J1, a magnetically ordered state with 3 × 3 periodicity eventually overcomes the U(1) Dirac spin liquid. Within the ferromagnetic J2 regime, evidence is shown in favor of a first-order transition at J2/J1=-0.065(5).

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…