Strong Conformity and Assembly Bias: Towards a Physical Understanding of the Galaxy-Halo Connection in SDSS Clusters
Abstract
Understanding the physical connection between cluster galaxies and massive haloes is key to mitigating systematic uncertainties in next-generation cluster cosmology. We develop a novel method to infer the level of conformity between the stellar mass of the brightest central galaxies~(BCGs) M*BCG and the satellite richness λ, defined as their correlation coefficient cc at fixed halo mass, using the abundance and weak lensing of SDSS clusters as functions of M*BCG and λ. We detect a halo mass-dependent conformity as cc=0.60+0.08(Mh/3×1014M/h). The strong conformity successfully resolves the "halo mass equality" conundrum discovered in Zu et al. 2021 -- when split by M*BCG at fixed λ, the low and high-M*BCG clusters have the same average halo mass despite having a 0.34 dex discrepancy in average M*BCG. On top of the best-fitting conformity model, we develop a cluster assembly bias~(AB) prescription calibrated against the CosmicGrowth simulation, and build a conformity+AB model for the cluster weak lensing measurements. Our model predicts that with a 20\% lower halo concentration c, the low-M*BCG clusters are 10\% more biased than the high-M*BCG systems, in excellent agreement with the observations. We also show that the observed conformity and assembly bias are unlikely due to projection effects. Finally, we build a toy model to argue that while the early-time BCG-halo co-evolution drives the M*BCG-c correlation, the late-time dry merger-induced BCG growth naturally produces the M*BCG-λ conformity despite the well-known anti-correlation between λ and c. Our method paves the path towards simultaneously constraining cosmology and cluster formation with future cluster surveys.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.