Studying magnetic fields and dust in M17 using polarized thermal dust emission observed by SOFIA/HAWC+

Abstract

We report the highest spatial resolution measurement of magnetic fields in M17 using thermal dust polarization taken by SOFIA/HAWC+ centered at 154 μm wavelength. Using the Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi method, we found the presence of strong magnetic fields of 980 230\;μG and 1665 885\;μG in lower-density (M17-N) and higher-density (M17-S) regions, respectively. The magnetic field morphology in M17-N possibly mimics the fields in gravitational collapse molecular cores while in M17-S the fields run perpendicular to the matter structure and display a pillar and an asymmetric hourglass shape. The mean values of the magnetic field strength are used to determine the Alfv\'enic Mach numbers (MA) of M17-N and M17-S which turn out to be sub-Alfv\'enic, or magnetic fields dominate turbulence. We calculate the mass-to-flux ratio, λ, and obtain λ=0.07 for M17-N and 0.28 for M17-S. The sub-critical values of λ are in agreement with the lack of massive stars formed in M17. To study dust physics, we analyze the relationship between the dust polarization fraction, p, and the thermal emission intensity, I, gas column density, N( H2), and dust temperature, T d. The polarization fraction decreases with intensity as I-α with α = 0.51. The polarization fraction also decreases with increasing N( H2), which can be explained by the decrease of grain alignment by radiative torques (RATs) toward denser regions with a weaker radiation field and/or tangling of magnetic fields. The polarization fraction tends to increase with T d first and then decreases when T d > 50 K. The latter feature seen in the M17-N, where the gas density changes slowly with Td, is consistent with the RAT disruption effect.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…