Synchronized Co-evolution between Supermassive Black Holes and Galaxies Over the Last Seven Billion Years as Revealed by the Hyper Suprime-Cam

Abstract

We measure the evolution of the M BH-M* relation using 584 uniformly-selected SDSS quasars at 0.2<z<0.8. The black-hole masses (M BH) are derived from the single-epoch virial mass estimator using the Hβ emission line, and span the range 7.0< log\,M BH/M<9.5. The host-galaxy stellar masses (M*), which cover the interval 10.0< log\,M* / M <11.5, are determined by performing two-dimensional quasar-host decomposition of the Hyper Suprime-Cam images and spectral energy distribution fitting. To quantify sample-selection biases and measurement uncertainties on the mass terms, a mock quasar sample is constructed to jointly constrain the redshift evolution of the M BH-M* relation and its intrinsic scatter (σμ) through forward modeling. We find that the level of evolution is degenerate with σμ, such that both positive mild evolution (i.e, M BH/M* increases with redshift) with a small σμ, and negative mild evolution with a larger σμ are consistent with our data. The posterior distribution of σμ enables us to put a strong constraint on the intrinsic scatter of the M BH-M* relation, which has a best inference of 0.25-0.04+0.03 dex, consistent with the local value. The redshift evolution of the M BH-M* relation relative to the local relation is constrained to be (1+z)0.12-0.27+0.28, in agreement with no significant evolution since z0.8. The tight and non-evolving M BH-M* relation is suggestive of a coupling through AGN feedback or/and a common gas supply at work, thus restricting the mass ratio of galaxies and their black holes to a limited range. Given the considerable stellar disk component, the M BH-M bulge relation may evolve as previously seen at higher redshifts.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…