Minkowski inequality for nearly spherical domains
Abstract
We investigate the validity and the stability of various Minkowski-like inequalities for C1-perturbations of the ball. Let K⊂eq Rn be a domain (possibly not convex and not mean-convex) which is C1-close to a ball. We prove the sharp geometric inequality (∫∂ K II1 d Hn-1)1n-2 C1(n)Per(K)1n-1 , where C1(n) is the constant that yields the equality when K=B1 (and II1 is the sum of the absolute values of the eigenvalues of the second fundamental form II of ∂ K). Moreover, for any δ>0, if K is sufficiently C1-close to a ball, we show the almost sharp Minkowski inequality (∫∂ K H+ d Hn-1)1n-2 (C1(n)-δ)Per(K)1n-1 . If K is axially symmetric, we prove the Minkowski inequality with the sharp constant (i.e., δ=0). We establish also the sharp quantitative stability (in the family of C1-perturbations of the ball) of the volumetric Minkowski inequality (∫∂ K H+ d Hn-1)1n-2 C2(n)|K|1n , where C2(n) is the constant that yields the equality when K=B1. Finally, we show, by constructing a counterexample, that the mentioned inequalities are false (even for domains C1-close to the ball) if one replaces H+ with H.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.