Dynamic Ranking with the BTL Model: A Nearest Neighbor based Rank Centrality Method

Abstract

Many applications such as recommendation systems or sports tournaments involve pairwise comparisons within a collection of n items, the goal being to aggregate the binary outcomes of the comparisons in order to recover the latent strength and/or global ranking of the items. In recent years, this problem has received significant interest from a theoretical perspective with a number of methods being proposed, along with associated statistical guarantees under the assumption of a suitable generative model. While these results typically collect the pairwise comparisons as one comparison graph G, however in many applications - such as the outcomes of soccer matches during a tournament - the nature of pairwise outcomes can evolve with time. Theoretical results for such a dynamic setting are relatively limited compared to the aforementioned static setting. We study in this paper an extension of the classic BTL (Bradley-Terry-Luce) model for the static setting to our dynamic setup under the assumption that the probabilities of the pairwise outcomes evolve smoothly over the time domain [0,1]. Given a sequence of comparison graphs (Gt')t' ∈ T on a regular grid T ⊂ [0,1], we aim at recovering the latent strengths of the items wt* ∈ Rn at any time t ∈ [0,1]. To this end, we adapt the Rank Centrality method - a popular spectral approach for ranking in the static case - by locally averaging the available data on a suitable neighborhood of t. When (Gt')t' ∈ T is a sequence of Erd\"os-Renyi graphs, we provide non-asymptotic 2 and ∞ error bounds for estimating wt* which in particular establishes the consistency of this method in terms of n, and the grid size . We also complement our theoretical analysis with experiments on real and synthetic data.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…