Boundary Vorticity Estimates for Navier-Stokes and Application to the Inviscid Limit
Abstract
Consider the steady solution to the incompressible Euler equation u=Ae1 in the periodic tunnel = Td-1×(0,1) in dimension d=2,3. Consider now the family of solutions u to the associated Navier-Stokes equation with the no-slip condition on the flat boundaries, for small viscosities =A/Re, and initial values in L2. We are interested in the weak inviscid limits up to subsequences u u∞ when both the viscosity converges to 0, and the initial value u0 converges to Ae1 in L2. Under a conditional assumption on the energy dissipation close to the boundary, Kato showed in 1984 that u converges to Ae1 strongly in L2 uniformly in time under this double limit. It is still unknown whether this inviscid limit is unconditionally true. The convex integration method produces solutions u E to the Euler equation with the same initial values Ae1 which verify at time 0<T<T0: \|uE(T)-Ae1\|L2()2≈ A3T. This predicts the possibility of a layer separation with an energy of order A3 T. We show in this paper that the energy of layer separation associated with any asymptotic u∞ obtained via double limits cannot be more than \|u∞(T)-Ae1\|L2 ()2 A3T. This result holds unconditionally for any weak limit of Leray-Hopf solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation. Especially, it shows that, even if the limit is not unique, the shear flow pattern is observable up to time 1/A. This provides a notion of stability despite the possible non-uniqueness of the limit predicted by the convex integration theory. The result relies on a new boundary vorticity estimate for the Navier-Stokes equation. This new estimate, inspired by previous work on higher regularity estimates for Navier-Stokes, provides a nonlinear control scalable through the inviscid limit.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.