The pre-Pieri rules
Abstract
Let R be a commutative ring and n≥1 and p≥0 two integers. Let hk,\ i be an element of R for all k∈ Z and i∈ [n]. For any α∈ Zn, we define \[ tα:=pmatrix hα1+1,\ 1 & hα1+2,\ 1 & ·s & hα1+n,\ 1\\ hα2+1,\ 2 & hα2+2,\ 2 & ·s & hα2+n,\ 2\\ & & & \\ hαn+1,\ n & hαn+2,\ n & ·s & hαn+n,\ n pmatrix ∈ R \] (where αi denotes the i-th entry of α). Then, we have the identity \[ Σβ∈\0,1,2,…\n ;\\ |β|=ptα+β = pmatrix hα1+1,\ 1 & hα1+2,\ 1 & ·s & hα1+(n-1),\ 1 & hα1+(n+p),\ 1\\ hα2+1,\ 2 & hα2+2,\ 2 & ·s & hα2+(n-1),\ 2 & hα2+(n+p),\ 2\\ & & & & \\ hαn+1,\ n & hαn+2,\ n & ·s & hαn+(n-1),\ n & hαn+(n+p),\ n pmatrix \] (where α+β denotes the entrywise sum of the tuples α and β). Furthermore, if p≤ n, then \[ Σβ∈\ 0,1\ n ;\\| β| =ptα+β= pmatrix hα1+ξ1 ,\ 1 & hα1+ξ2 ,\ 1 & ·s & hα1+ξn ,\ 1\\ hα2+ξ1 ,\ 2 & hα2+ξ2 ,\ 2 & ·s & hα2+ξn ,\ 2\\ & & & \\ hαn+ξ1 ,\ n & hαn+ξ2 ,\ n & ·s & hαn+ξn ,\ n pmatrix , \] where ξ=(1,2,…,n-p,n-p+2,n-p+3,…,n+1). We prove these two identities (in a slightly more general setting, where R is not assumed commutative) and use them to derive some variants of the Pieri rule found in the literature.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.