Distributivity and Minimality in Perfect Tree Forcings for Singular Cardinals

Abstract

Dobrinen, Hathaway and Prikry studied a forcing P consisting of perfect trees of height λ and width where is a singular ω-strong limit of cofinality λ. They showed that if is singular of countable cofinality, then P is minimal for ω-sequences assuming that is a supremum of a sequence of measurable cardinals. We obtain this result without the measurability assumption. Prikry proved that P is (ω,)-distributive for all < given a singular ω-strong limit cardinal of countable cofinality, and Dobrinen et al. asked whether this result generalizes if has uncountable cofinality. We answer their question in the negative by showing that P is not (λ,2)-distributive if is a λ-strong limit of uncountable cofinality λ and we obtain the same result for a range of similar forcings, including one that Dobrinen et al. consider that consists of pre-perfect trees. We also show that P in particular is not (ω,·,λ+)-distributive under these assumptions. While developing these ideas, we address natural questions regarding minimality and collapses of cardinals.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…