Roman domination in graphs with minimum degree at least two and some forbidden cycles

Abstract

Let G=(V,E) be a graph of order n and let γ R(G) and ∂ (G) denote the Roman domination number and the differential of G, respectively. In this paper we prove that for any integer k≥ 0, if G is a graph of order n≥ 6k+9, minimum degree δ ≥ 2, which does not contain any induced \C5,C8,… ,C3k+2\% -cycles, then γ R(G)≤ (4k+8)n6k+11. This bound is an improvement of the bounds given in [E.W. Chambers, B. Kinnersley, N. Prince, and D.B. West, Extremal problems for Roman domination, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 23 (2009) 1575--1586] when k=0, and [S. Bermudo, On the differential and Roman domination number of a graph with minimum degree two, Discrete Appl. Math. 232 (2017), 64--72] when k=1. Moreover, using the Gallai-type result involving the Roman domination number and the differential of graphs established by Bermudo et al. stating that γ R(G)+∂ (G)=n, we have ∂ (G)≥ (2k+3)n6k+11, thereby settling the conjecture of Bermudo posed in the second paper.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…