Renormalized vac without m4 terms

Abstract

The cosmological constant term, , in Einstein's equations has been for three decades a building block of the concordance or standard model of cosmology. Although the latter is not free of fundamental problems, it provides a good phenomenological description of the overall cosmological observations. However, an interesting improvement in such a phenomenological description and also a change in the theoretical status of the -term occurs upon realizing that the vacuum energy density, vac, is actually a "running quantity" in quantum field theory in curved spacetime. Several works have shown that this option can compete with the with a rigid . The so-called, "running vacuum models" (RVM) are characterized indeed by a vac which is evolving with time as a series of even powers of the Hubble parameter and its time derivatives. This form has been motivated by renormalization group arguments in previous works. Here we review a recent detailed computation by the authors of the renormalized energy-momentum tensor of a non-minimally coupled scalar field with the help of adiabatic regularization. The final result is noteworthy: vac(H) takes the precise structure of the RVM, namely a constant term plus a dynamical component H2 (which may be detectable in the present universe) including also higher order effects O(H4) which can be of interest during the early stages of the cosmological evolution. Besides, it is most remarkable that such renormalized form of vac does not carry dangerous terms proportional to m4, the quartic powers of the masses of the fields, which are a well-known source of exceedingly large contributions to the vacuum energy density and are directly responsible for fine tuning in the context of the CC problem.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…