Radial overlap correction to superallowed 0+ 0+ nuclear β decays using the shell model with Hartree-Fock radial wave functions

Abstract

The radial overlap correction, δRO is re-examined for 30 superallowed β decays using the shell model with Hartree-Fock (HF) radial wave functions. Our calculation is based on the Skyrme interaction including Coulomb, Charge-Symmetry-Breaking (CSB) and Charge-Independence-Breaking (CIB) terms. The corrections due to the gradient of charge density, vacuum polarization, Coulomb spin-orbit and finite size of nucleons are also considered. To avoid the spurious isospin mixing, the local equivalent potential is constructed from the solution of a HF calculation for the Z=N nucleus without charge-dependent forces. The obtained mean field is solved non-iteratively for the parent and daughter nuclei. It turns out that the CIB term has no significant impact on δRO. On the other hand, the CSB term makes δRO increasing between 10 and 30%. The gradient density leads to a further increase of δRO between 2 and 14%, while other electromagnetic corrections are negligible. The effect of the suppression of isospin spuriosity is somewhat complicated. In general, it produces a larger δRO value, however there are few cases for which δRO is mostly unaffected or even reduced, especially the light even-even emitters. All these improvements partly explain the long-standing discrepancy between the correction values obtained with Woods-Saxon (WS) and HF radial wave functions. Nevertheless, the remaining discrepancy is still significant, except for the emitters with A 26. In addition, the staggering presented on the results obtained with the WS potential are not well reproduced by our calculations. This subsequently leads to a large difference in the predicted mirror ft ratios. These problems might relate to the errors of the calculated radii as well as correlation in the data used for constraining the asymptotic radial wave functions.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…