On formally undecidable propositions in nondeterministic languages
Abstract
Any class of languages L accepted in time T has a counterpart NL accepted in nondeterministic time NT. It follows from the definition of nondeterministic languages that L ⊂eq NL. This work shows that every sufficiently powerful language in L contains a string corresponding to G\"odel's undecidable proposition, but this string is not contained in its nondeterministic counterpart. This inconsistency in the definition of nondeterministic languages shows that certain questions regarding nondeterministic time complexity equivalences are irrevocably ill-posed.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.