Now you see it, now you don't: Star formation truncation precedes the loss of molecular gas by ~100 Myr in massive post-starburst galaxies at z~0.6

Abstract

We use ALMA observations of CO(2-1) in 13 massive (M 1011 M) post-starburst galaxies at z0.6 to constrain the molecular gas content in galaxies shortly after they quench their major star-forming episode. The post-starburst galaxies in this study are selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey spectroscopic samples (DR14) based on their spectral shapes, as part of the SQuIGGLE program. Early results showed that two post-starburst galaxies host large H2 reservoirs despite their low inferred star formation rates. Here we expand this analysis to a larger statistical sample of 13 galaxies. Six of the primary targets (45%) are detected, with MH2109 M. Given their high stellar masses, this mass limit corresponds to an average gas fraction of fH2 MH2/M 7\%, or 14\% using lower stellar masses estimates derived from analytic, exponentially declining star formation histories. The gas fraction correlates with the Dn4000 spectral index, suggesting that the cold gas reservoirs decrease with time since burst, as found in local K+A galaxies. Star formation histories derived from flexible stellar population synthesis modeling support this empirical finding: galaxies that quenched 150 Myr prior to observation host detectable CO(2-1) emission, while older post-starburst galaxies are undetected. The large H2 reservoirs and low star formation rates in the sample imply that the quenching of star formation precedes the disappearance of the cold gas reservoirs. However, within the following 100-200 Myrs, the SQuIGGLE galaxies require the additional and efficient heating or removal of cold gas to bring their low star formation rates in line with standard H2 scaling relations.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…