Birational classification for algebraic tori

Abstract

We give a stably birational classification for algebraic tori of dimensions 3 and 4 over a field k. First, we define the weak stably equivalence of algebraic tori and show that there exist 13 (resp. 128) weak stably equivalent classes of algebraic tori T of dimension 3 (resp. 4) which are not stably rational by computing some cohomological stably birational invariants, e.g. the Brauer-Grothendieck group of X where X is a smooth compactification of T, provided by Kunyavskii, Skorobogatov and Tsfasman. We make a procedure to compute such stably birational invariants effectively and the computations are done by using the computer algebra system GAP. Second, we define the p-part of the flabby class [T]fl as a Zp[ Sylp(G)]-lattice and prove that they are faithful and indecomposable Zp[ Sylp(G)]-lattices unless it vanishes for p=2 (resp. p=2,3) in dimension 3 (resp. 4) via p-adic analysis. The Zp-ranks of them are also given. Third, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for which two not stably rational algebraic tori T and T of dimensions 3 (resp. 4) are stably birationally equivalent in terms of the splitting fields and the weak stably equivalent classes of T and T. In particular, the splitting fields of them should coincide if T and T are indecomposable. Forth, for each 7 cases of not stably but retract rational algebraic tori of dimension 4, we find an algebraic torus T of dimension 4 which satisfies that T×k T is stably rational. Finally, we give a criteria to determine whether two algebraic tori T and T of general dimensions are stably birationally equivalent when T (resp. T) is stably birationally equivalent to some algebraic torus T of dimension up to 4.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…