IGM damping wing constraints on reionisation from covariance reconstruction of two z7 QSOs

Abstract

Bright, high redshift (z>6) QSOs are powerful probes of the ionisation state of the intervening intergalactic medium (IGM). The detection of Lyα damping wing absorption imprinted in the spectrum of high-z QSOs can provide strong constraints on the epoch of reionisation (EoR). In this work, we perform an independent Lyα damping wing analysis of two known z>7 QSOs; DESJ0252-0503 at z=7.00 (Wang et al.) and J1007+2115 at z=7.51 (Yang et al.). For this, we utilise our existing Bayesian framework which simultaneously accounts for uncertainties in: (i) the intrinsic Lyα emission profile (reconstructed from a covariance matrix of measured emission lines; extended in this work to include NV) and (ii) the distribution of ionised (H\, II) regions within the IGM using a 1.63 Gpc3 reionisation simulation. This approach is complementary to that used in the aforementioned works as it focuses solely redward of Lyα (1218 < λ < 1230) making it more robust to modelling uncertainties while also using a different methodology for (i) and (ii). We find, for a fiducial EoR morphology, x HI = 0.64+0.19 \\ -0.23 (68 per cent) at z=7 and x HI = 0.27+0.21 \\ -0.17 at z=7.51 consistent within 1σ to the previous works above, though both are slightly lower in amplitude. Following the inclusion of NV into our reconstruction pipeline, we perform a reanalysis of ULASJ1120+0641 at z=7.09 (Mortlock et al.) and ULASJ1342+0928 at z=7.54 (Ba\~nados et al.) finding x HI = 0.44+0.23 \\ -0.24 at z=7.09 and x HI = 0.31+0.18 \\ -0.19 at z=7.54. Finally, we combine the QSO damping wing constraints for all four z7 QSOs to obtain a single, unified constraint of x HI = 0.49+0.11 \\ -0.11 at z=7.29.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…