Enumeration of three-quadrant walks via invariants: some diagonally symmetric models

Abstract

In the past 20 years, the enumeration of plane lattice walks confined to a convex cone -- normalized into the first quadrant -- has received a lot of attention, stimulated the development of several original approaches, and led to a rich collection of results. Most of them deal with the nature of the associated generating function: for which models is it algebraic, D-finite, D-algebraic? By model, what we mean is a finite collection of allowed steps. More recently, similar questions have been raised for non-convex cones, typically the three-quadrant cone C = \ (i,j) : i ≥ 0 or j ≥ 0 \. They turn out to be more difficult than their quadrant counterparts. In this paper, we investigate a collection of eight models in C. This collection consists of diagonally symmetric models in \-1, 0,1\2\(-1,1), (1,-1)\. Three of them are known not to be D-algebraic. We show that the remaining five can be solved in a uniform fashion using Tutte's notion of invariants, which has already proved useful for some quadrant models. Three models are found to be algebraic, one is (only) D-finite, and the last one is (only) D-algebraic. We also solve in the same fashion the diagonal model \ , , , \, which is D-finite. The three algebraic models are those of the Kreweras trilogy, S=\, ←, \, S'=\→, , \, and S S'. Our solutions take similar forms for all six models. Roughly speaking, the square of the generating function of three-quadrant walks with steps in S is an explicit rational function in the quadrant generating function with steps in \(j-i,j): (i,j) ∈ S\. We derive various corollaries, including an explicit algebraic description of the positive harmonic function in C for the five models that are at least D-finite.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…